IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ldr/wpaper/252.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Changes in South African well-being between 2008/9 and 2014/15: The evidence from expenditure and asset data

Author

Listed:
  • Motshidisi Nthatisi

    (Poverty and Inequality Statistics, Statistics South Africa)

  • Martin Wittenberg

    (School of Economics and DataFirst, University of Cape Town)

Abstract

South Africa's Living Conditions Surveys (LCSs) are crucial instruments in monitoring the well-being of South Africa's population. Using expenditure as the yardstick for assessing well-being, the LCSs show a marked drop in poverty between 2008/09 and 2014/09. This would be a welcome trend. Unfortunately, the data collection method changed between these surveys so that there is at least some doubt as to whether the trend is real or due to measurement changes. Given that the expenditure modules are quite onerous for respondents this is an important question. In this paper we assess the reliability of the measured improvement of welfare by analysing also the information in the asset modules of these surveys. In comparison to the expenditure diaries the asset modules are much easier to complete and should therefore be much less prone to measurement error. We combine the information in the asset variables by constructing various asset indices and show that if these are used across the surveys they confirm that indeed average well-being has improved between 2008/09 and 2014/15.

Suggested Citation

  • Motshidisi Nthatisi & Martin Wittenberg, 2019. "Changes in South African well-being between 2008/9 and 2014/15: The evidence from expenditure and asset data," SALDRU Working Papers 252, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    • Handle: RePEc:ldr:wpaper:252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opensaldru.uct.ac.za/handle/11090/967
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    poverty measurement; asset indices;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ldr:wpaper:252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alison Siljeur (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sauctza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.