IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lae/wpaper/201242.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Brazil nut harvesters do not comply with hunting regulations: The case of the Manuripi National Wildlife Reserve

Author

Listed:
  • Sophía Espinoza Antezana

    (Conservation Strategy Fund (CSF))

Abstract

This paper analyzes the determinant factors affecting compliance behavior in hunting regulation. The study is focused on the Brazil nut Regulation for the Manuripi National Wildlife Reserve in Bolivia’s Amazon Forest, in which was established the hunting prohibition for temporary harvesters working on private property. In addition to deterrence variables, this paper considers the factors of moral obligation, social influence, knowledge of rules and legitimacy. Adding to the existing literature, we also explore the effect of cultural factors on compliance behavior. The results indicate that the social influence, moral obligation and legitimacy of the hunting prohibition regulation are relevant for violation decisions, while the perception of the probability of detection is not a strong determinant. Additionally, the results suggest that both the harvesters’ productivity and non-wild meat supply on the reserve’s private property determine hunting decisions. Most interestingly, we found that a cultural factor related to the harvesters’ habits of eating bush-meat significantly affects their compliance behavior. We discuss some policy implications to improve compliance with the hunting prohibition in the Manuripi Reserve.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophía Espinoza Antezana, 2012. "Why Brazil nut harvesters do not comply with hunting regulations: The case of the Manuripi National Wildlife Reserve," Working Papers 201242, Latin American and Caribbean Environmental Economics Program, revised 2012.
  • Handle: RePEc:lae:wpaper:201242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://laceep.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=166:why-brazil-nut-harvesters&Itemid=87
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lae:wpaper:201242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liz Delgado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/laceecr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.