Two agents negotiate, according to the Nash bargaining solution, over the allocation of a single (divisible) commodity (or multiple commodities with fixed ordinal preferences). It has been shown that in this situation agents find dominant to report their least risk averse utility functions. This result depends crucially on the fact that in this kind of "distortion game", agents have been restricted to report risk-averse utility functions. This paper studies the distortion game originated when agents are also allowed to claim non risk-averse utility functions. Contrasting with previous literature, we find multiple Nash equilibria, multiple payo outcomes and the existence of a first-mover advantage.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number
04-02.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Henriette Aabo Hansen).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: