Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Changing Views of the Corporate Income Tax

Contents:

Author Info

  • Peter Birch Soerensen
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    (The introduction): Under a "classical" corporate tax system such as that prevailing in the United States, income from equity-financed corporate investment is taxed twice: at the corporate level a tax is levied on corporate profits after deduction for interest payments, and at the shareholder level dividends and realized capital gains on shares are subject to full personal income tax. - Over the years many economists have argued that this system of "double taxation" significantly reduces the overall investment level and drives capital from the corporate sector into lower-yielding projects in the non-corporate sector. Influenced by this line of argument, many governments in the OECD area haveintroduced measures to alleviate the double taxation of corporate source income, e.g. by granting a credit for the underlying corporate tax against the personal tax on dividends, and/or by offering favorable personal tax treatment of capital gains on shares. - On the other hand, some economists have claimed that the traditional view greatly overstates the distortionary efects of a classical corporate tax system, implying that double tax relief may cause a considerable loss of government revenue without generating much stimulus to investment. - It is clearly important for public policy which view of the corporation tax is the more correct one. This article attempts to explain in a non-technical manner the different viewpoints on the nature and impact of the corporate income tax. I will focus on the effects of double taxation of corporate source income on the cost of corporate capital, defined as the minimum pre-tax rate of return a corporate investment project must earn to be profitable. To limit the scope of the paper, the emphasis will be on theoretical ideas, with no systematic review of empirical evidence. In the first two parts of the paper I will abstract from the complications caused by international capital mobility, but the third part will address the special problems for corporate tax policy arising in the open economy.

    Download Info

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics in its series EPRU Working Paper Series with number 95-05.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation:
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:kud:epruwp:95-05

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark
    Phone: (+45) 3532 4411
    Fax: +45 35 32 30 00
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.econ.ku.dk/epru/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Agell, Jonas & Englund, Peter & Sodersten, Jan, 1996. "Tax Reform of the Century -- the Swedish Experiment," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 49(4), pages 643-64, December.
    2. Schönemann, Kristin, 2009. "Finanzierungsstrategien und ihre Auswirkungen auf den Unternehmenswert deutscher Immobilien-Kapitalgesellschaften," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 94, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    3. Schreiber, Ulrich & Spengel, Christoph & Lammersen, Lothar, 2001. "Effektive Steuerbelastungen bei Vorliegen ökonomischer Renten," ZEW Discussion Papers 01-26, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
    4. Dethier, Jean-Jacques & John, Christoph, 1998. "Taxing capital income in Hungary and the European Union," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1903, The World Bank.
    5. Brys, B. & Bovenberg, A.L., 2006. "The Life Cycle of the Firm with Debt and Capital Income Taxes," Discussion Paper 2006-91, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. Howell H. Zee, 2005. "Personal Income Tax Reform," IMF Working Papers 05/87, International Monetary Fund.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kud:epruwp:95-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Hoffmann).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.