IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kob/dpaper/dp2021-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Technological Competition among Big Five Using Patent Data: A Systematic and Scalable Approach Based on Information Retrieval Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Katsuyuki Tanaka

    (Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration(RIEB) and Center for Computational Social Science (CCSS), Kobe University, JAPAN)

  • Takashi Kamihigashi

    (Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration(RIEB) and Center for Computational Social Science (CCSS), Kobe University, JAPAN)

Abstract

This paper introduces a method for developing a systematic and scalable technological analysis framework based on information retrieval technology. We construct a technology information retrieval system by aggregating all information on patents (about a 100 million), and companies and individual inventors in Worldwide Patent Statistical Database (PATSTAT). Furthermore, we introduce a large-scale, systematic technological competition analysis as the framework enables a novel approach to conduct such analysis by searching technologically similar companies and individual inventors from the constructed information retrieval system. An analysis of the technological competition around the information technology giants, such as Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft, surprisingly, shows that technological conflicts are not as strong as they appear to be.

Suggested Citation

  • Katsuyuki Tanaka & Takashi Kamihigashi, 2021. "Measuring Technological Competition among Big Five Using Patent Data: A Systematic and Scalable Approach Based on Information Retrieval Technology," Discussion Paper Series DP2021-06, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
  • Handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2021-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2021-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rikobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.