IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kau/wpaper/200901.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food Security in Thailand: Status, Rural Poor Vulnerability, and Some Policy Options

Author

Listed:
  • Somporn Isvilanonda
  • Isriya Bunyasiri

    (Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics,Faculty of Economics,Kasetsart University,Thailand)

Abstract

Agricultural development policy in Thailand over the past few decades has been geared not only to the nation’s food security, but also to export earnings. Thailand is a food surplus country at the macro level but food accessibility at the household level remains a problem, particularly in remote rural areas. The recent increase in food price and production cost has impacted on the rural poor. With a declining purchasing power, the poor households face the risk of food insecurity as they may reduce their intake of more nutritious food. The impact of rising food prices on agricultural households depends on whether they are net buyers of food commodities whose prices have increased. In rice farming households, the share of net buyer households was higher among households with smaller land holding. Also, the poor rice farmers in Thailand were severely affected by the higher production cost and input prices since the reduction in their net profits was larger. While nearly two-thirds of their operating cost was cash expense, they received only one-tenth from the rice sold. In order for the rural poor to cope with future impacts of high food price and rising production cost, a provision of off-farm employment and micro-credit with technical assistance and proper farm management plans should be targeted to small farmers and rural poor. In the longer-run, it is suggested that small-scale farmer capacity building and empowerment based on the sufficiency economy concept is necessary. This should be complemented by enhancing farm productivity through agricultural research and improvement in village-pool water resources including on-farm water resource management and investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Somporn Isvilanonda & Isriya Bunyasiri, 2009. "Food Security in Thailand: Status, Rural Poor Vulnerability, and Some Policy Options," Working Papers 200901, Kasetsart University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:kau:wpaper:200901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agri.eco.ku.ac.th/RePEc/kau/wpaper/are200901.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sina Xie & Orachos Napasintuwong, 2014. "Review of Rice Policies in China, Thailand and Vietnam," Working Papers 201403, Kasetsart University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Astrud Lea Beringer & Jutamas Kaewsuk, 2018. "Emerging Livelihood Vulnerabilities in an Urbanizing and Climate Uncertain Environment for the Case of a Secondary City in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Nuntana Udomkit & Pornthip Yungvisessuk & Claus Schreier, 2021. "Effects of Paddy Price Intervention on the Rice Mill Business: A Case Study of the Paddy Pledging Programme in Thailand," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1362-1374, December.
    4. Peter R. Berti & Rachelle E. Desrochers & Hoi Pham Van & An Lê Văn & Tung Duc Ngo & Ky Hoang The & Nga Le Thi & Prasit Wangpakapattanawong, 2016. "The process of developing a nutrition-sensitive agriculture intervention: a multi-site experience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(6), pages 1053-1068, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Thailand; food security; agricultural policy; rural poor vulnerability; policy options;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kau:wpaper:200901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanchana Sripruetkiat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feckuth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.