IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jbs/wpaper/201502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quantifying the Implicit Climate Subsidy Received by Leading Fossil Fuel Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Hope

    (Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge)

  • Jimena Alvarez

    (Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge)

  • Paul Gilding

    (Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Fossil fuel companies sell the products that cause the vast majority of anthropogenic climate change. These companies don't pay for the economic damage these products cause to society. The IMF calculated that in 2011 this implicit subsidy amounted to about $800 billion globally. This implicit subsidy represents a risk to individual companies because as society seeks to reduce or recover the economic costs fossil fuels create, company profits could be lost and assets stranded by the resulting shift to low carbon energy. As a result attempts are being made to identify companies most at risk. However, no company-level model exists to compare present-day implicit subsidies and therefore risk level. Here we calculate these subsidies, by company, for the years 2008 to 2012. For all companies the implicit subsidy exceeded their post-tax profit (averaged over five years). For all pure coal companies, the implicit subsidy exceeded total revenues. There is substantial variation between companies within the same fuel type. We anticipate that these results will be a useful starting point for investors seeking to manage their exposure to climate change risk, and for policy makers interested in fossil fuel companies' net contribution to society.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Hope & Jimena Alvarez & Paul Gilding, 2015. "Quantifying the Implicit Climate Subsidy Received by Leading Fossil Fuel Companies," Working Papers 2015/02, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:jbs:wpaper:201502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/wp1502.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fossil fuel; climate change; carbon tax;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jbs:wpaper:201502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ruth Newman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jicamuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.