IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iwe/workpr/107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reflections on the timing of EU enlargement

Author

Listed:
  • Andras Inotai

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Rapid accession does not seem to be an attainable goal for all candidate countries in the short term. So the EU needs to take two steps to keep the enlargement process sustainable and transparent. First, Brussels has to offer a clear, gradual time schedule to the candidates that are not in the first wave of enlargement, at the latest, at the time when the date of the first enlargement is set. Secondly, the principle of partial membership has to be applied in practice as well. This approach has to be clearly differentiated from ‘second-class membership’, which would be unacceptable to the candidate countries for political, economic and psychological reasons. Partial membership means that some candidate countries would participate in some community actions and programmes as full members, while in other areas they still did not qualify for membership. Already today, there is a good example of this, in the participation of candidate countries in the EU’s fifth R & D framework programme. It is very likely that the new Schengen borders of the EU may be based on the same approach. The EU maturity of some candidate countries will develop at a slower (or much slower) pace than the requirements for a European security policy, which results fundamentally from growing social and public pressure within the current EU member-states. So overcoming this ‘time gap’ may call for some innovative concepts. Membership of the Schengen framework by the Baltic States, Bulgaria and Romania could save the EU (and most of the first-wave candidate countries) a lot of money. In geographical terms, it could extend the security borders of Europe, while stabilizing the part of Central and Eastern Europe that could otherwise be divided by an enlargement in different stages. The solution to this danger is not to delay the membership of all candidates, but to develop transitional plans based on clear timing. That is the only way to guarantee the stability of the region and strengthen the cooperation among the countries and peoples of Central and Eastern Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Andras Inotai, 2000. "Reflections on the timing of EU enlargement," IWE Working Papers 107, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vgi.krtk.hu/publikacio/no-107-2000-03/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kochenov, Dimitry, 2005. "EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty Custom Concubinage?," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 9, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanász Mária (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vkhashu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.