IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/201701010800001711.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food and Drug Administration Guidance 209 and 213 and Veterinary Feed Directive regulations regarding antibiotic use in livestock: A survey of preparation and anticipated impacts in the swine industry

Author

Listed:
  • Schulz, Lee L.
  • Rademacher, Christopher J.

Abstract

A convenience sample survey of practicing swine veterinarians was conducted to describe the ways veterinarians and their producers prepared to comply with the Veterinary Feed Directive. The survey provides a benchmark for preparedness and prospective assessment of anticipated costs and ongoing education and training needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Schulz, Lee L. & Rademacher, Christopher J., 2017. "Food and Drug Administration Guidance 209 and 213 and Veterinary Feed Directive regulations regarding antibiotic use in livestock: A survey of preparation and anticipated impacts in the swine industry," ISU General Staff Papers 201701010800001711, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201701010800001711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7c83d66d-4bfe-45a8-bf05-fa1ebdf36740/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stacy Sneeringer & Gianna Short & Matthew MacLachlan & Maria Bowman, 2020. "Impacts on Livestock Producers and Veterinarians of FDA Policies on Use of Medically Important Antibiotics in Food Animal Production," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 674-694, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201701010800001711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.