IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198001010800008113.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An evaluation of improved sole-crop production technology on small farms in Northern Nigeria under different farm power sources: a multi-period linear programming approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ogungbile, Abraham Oyediji

Abstract

The basic problem of small farms in Northern Nigeria is low productivity and consequently a chronic low farm income. Potential strategies often suggested to solve the problem include: (a) the use of improved technology such as commercial fertilizers, insecticides, improved seed varieties and planting materials. This form of technology is considered capable of increasing output on the existing area currently under cultivation, (b) agricultural output can also be increased by bringing more land into cultivation. This approach will necessitate the use of some form of labor-augmenting chemical or mechanical devices relevant to the felt needs of the small farmer in order to absorb resulting extra labor requirement;This study employs a combination of the two strategies above in solving agricultural development problem in the Zaria area of northern Nigeria. It compares the production potential and optimum growth paths consistent with the use of improved practices and employment of three different power farm sources, namely: (a) human labor only, (b) chemical weed control, and (c) oxen power. A five-year multi-period linear programming technique is used to analyze the impact of adoption of improved practices, utilization of alternative power sources, varying wage rates, and different labor supply situations on small farm income, resource use, employment and farm growth;When hired labor and borrowed capital are unrestricted, the maximum attainable farm size of 12 hectares is achieved regardless of farm power employed. Oxen technology generates the highest income, followed by hand labor system and the least results from the use of herbicides. However, annual income for the first year when the farm size is about four hectares is highest for the hand technology. The use of oxen and herbicide completely solves the labor shortage problem during the peak growing season, when the farm size is within six hectares, but the problem resurfaces when farm size exceeds six hectares. The use of herbicide does nothing to solve labor shortage problem of the harvesting season while oxen utilization offers little relief. Only oxen technology exhibits some cost advantage as farm size increases;With increased wage rate, farm size under the hand and herbicide technologies cannot attain the specified maximum at the end of the planning horizon. The maximum farm size is achieved under the oxen technology even tough there is a substantial reduction in income;When the quantity of labor that can be hired during the peak growing season is restricted, net incomes under the three power technologies not only decline, the optimum crop patterns also change. Farm growth is retarded for the three technologies. A farmer operating under the oxen system is able to achieve an average farm size of ten hectares, his counterpart using herbicide can cope with nine hectares, and that using hand tools alone can maintain only seven hectares.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogungbile, Abraham Oyediji, 1980. "An evaluation of improved sole-crop production technology on small farms in Northern Nigeria under different farm power sources: a multi-period linear programming approach," ISU General Staff Papers 198001010800008113, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198001010800008113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/d95e807e-554b-4d40-8af2-3925a761fe6c/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198001010800008113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.