IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/irp/essays/409.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mode choice analysis of mobility in Florence. A choice experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Berni
  • Fabrizia Mealli

    (Università degli studi di Firenze)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a choice experiment intended to evaluate the preferences of transport users who move for studying and working reasons in the Florentine area. After a first review of choice experiments and discrete choice multinomial models, the case study is illustrated, considering in details: the suggested experimental plan; the choice experiment administered; the results of the estimations obtained from the discrete choice models on the collected data. The findings demonstrate the presence of some choice rigidities, and the ensuing difficulty of making the users shift from one typology of transport to another by pointing to the costs and commuting times of the transport means

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Berni & Fabrizia Mealli, 2013. "Mode choice analysis of mobility in Florence. A choice experiment," Studi e approfondimenti 409, Istituto Regionale per la Programmazione Economica della Toscana.
  • Handle: RePEc:irp:essays:409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.irpet.it/storage/pubblicazioneallegato/409_Berni_Mealli_Analisi%20delle%20scelte%20modali.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    choice experiments; mixed fractional factorial design; discrete choice multinomial models; Florentine area;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:irp:essays:409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Salvucci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irpetit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.