Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

ERAWATCH country reports 2011: Switzerland

Contents:

Author Info

  • Arvanitis Spyros

    ()
    (ETH Zurich)

  • Florian Seliger

    (ETH Zurich)

  • Martin Wörter

    ()
    (ETH Zurich)

Abstract

The main objective of the ERAWATCH Annual Country Reports is to characterise and assess the performance of national research systems and related policies in a structured manner that is comparable across countries. The 2011 country reports assess the evolution on the national R&D investments targets, the efficiency and effectiveness of national policies and investments into R&D, the articulation between education, research and innovation, with an increased focus on the last two in terms of their wider governance and policy mix. The reports for EU MS and AS integrates in the assessment the evolution of the national policy mixes in the perspective of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals and on the realisation and better governance of ERA.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/erawatch/export/sites/default/galleries/generic_files/file_0332.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre in its series JRC-IPTS Working Papers with number JRC77777.

as in new window
Length: 37 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2012
Date of revision: Dec 2012
Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc77777

Contact details of provider:
Postal: C/ Inca Garcilaso, s/n 41092 Seville
Phone: +34 954 48 8318
Fax: +34 954 48 8300
Web page: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: European research and innovation policy; ERAWATCH; European Research Area; Policy Mixes; Transnational and International Cooperation; NETWATCH; ERA Nets; Foresight; Joint programming of research; Researchers; Universities; European Foresight Platform (EFP); modelling; linking Qualitative and Quantitative methods.;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Spyros Arvanitis & Laurent Donzé & Nora Sydow, 2005. "Wirksamkeit der Projektförderung der Kommission für Technologie und Innovation (KTI) : Analyse auf der Basis verschiedener «Matched-Pairs»- Methoden," KOF Working papers, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich 05-103, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc77777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rafael Castillo).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.