IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc124839.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development of unit costs for reimbursement of surveillance activities of Animal Health Programmes

Author

Listed:

Abstract

An EU financial contribution for eradication, control and surveillance programmes (veterinary programmes) can be granted to Member States (MS) based on the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 652/2014. The current methodology to calculate unit costs is based on Commission Decision C(2018) 2315 of 23 April 2018. However, during the first year of application several limitations were identified by both MS and EU officials.This technical report revises the methodologies that have previously been applied for unit cost calculations and develops a methodology for the reimbursement of the eradication, control and surveillance activities of Animal Health Programmes. The new methodology aims at reaching the highest level of administrative simplification possible while complying with the economy, efficiency and effectiveness principles of the Multiannual Financial Framework (2021-2027). The study was commissioned by DG SANTE. Our approach calculates unit costs for both testing and sampling activities. Unit cost calculations for sampling activities are based on two components: salary data from Eurostat statistics and sampling time data as determined by European Commission veterinary experts. Unit cost calculations for testing activities are also based on Eurostat statistics and on two additional components: material costs and testing times. For these last two components we used different data sources (i.e. EU Reference Laboratories, market data from commercial laboratories and a MS questionnaire).Significant methodological simplifications and improvements of the parameters used have been achieved in comparison to the previous methodological approach. This methodology proposes the grouping of data values utilised in the calculation of unit costs as a trade-off between simplification and accuracy. The number of unit costs proposed for sampling and testing activities is 24 and 216 respectively, representing a significant reduction in contrast to the unit costs under C(2018) 2315, where the number of unit costs were 162 and 1080 respectively. This new methodology also proposed an improvement in data acquisition by using data homogenous to all MS and harmonised EU statistical data (e.g. Eurostat). The use of the most up-to-date data available to estimate the costs of consumables and the time needed to perform a test also represent an improvement compared to previous methodologies, as the proposed parameters correlate better with real data than the previous approach.

Suggested Citation

  • SOTO EMBODAS Iria & DI BARTOLO Fabiola & RODRIGUEZ CEREZO Emilio & BARREIRO HURLE Jesus, 2021. "Development of unit costs for reimbursement of surveillance activities of Animal Health Programmes," JRC Research Reports JRC124839, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc124839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC124839
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Animal Health Programmes;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc124839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.