IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/dclass/202308.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Validity of Four-day Week Pilots

Author

Listed:
  • CUELLO Hugo

Abstract

The four-day workweek has gained global attention and popularity, with supporters arguing it can improve several conditions, such as productivity, job creation, and the environment. Small-scale pilot programmes are being carried out to better understand the concept, but it is crucial to ensure they are well-designed and implemented for reliable results. This working paper assesses the quantitative outcomes, scope, and methodological limitations of recent pilots and provides insight into future pilot designs for a more comprehensive understanding of the four-day workweek. A framework for categorising the four-day week pilots is presented, followed by an in-depth analysis of three case studies and their approaches to measuring various performance indicators and outcomes. The main section of the working paper provides a comprehensive examination of the quantitative limitations of the four-day week pilots. Drawing on these limitations, the paper offers ten specific recommendations for future researchers and policymakers to enhance the validity of four-day week pilots.

Suggested Citation

  • CUELLO Hugo, 2023. "Assessing the Validity of Four-day Week Pilots," JRC Working Papers on Social Classes in the Digital Age 2023-08, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:dclass:202308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC133008
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:dclass:202308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.