IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipe/ipetds/1354.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compatibilizando Direitos Sociais com Competividade: Fiscais do Trabalho e a Implementação da Legislação Trabalhista no Brasil

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Pires

Abstract

Este estudo trata da seguinte questão: como compatibilizar direitos trabalhistas e proteção social com competitividade e produtividade das empresas? Na América Latina, há um intenso debate sobre a perversidade da legislação trabalhista (considerada prejudicial para os trabalhadores e para as empresas) e, em resposta, a política recomendada atualmente enfatiza a desregulamentação e a flexibilização dos direitos trabalhistas existentes. Em contraposição a essa recomendação convencional, este estudo demonstra que há uma “margem de manobra” ainda pouco explorada para conciliar direitos trabalhistas com competitividade que reside na etapa de implementação da legislação trabalhista, em vez da reforma legal. Investigou-se o trabalho realizado na “linha de frente” por fiscais do trabalho em, principalmente, dois estados brasileiros (Minas Gerais e Bahia) e descobriu-se que em alguns casos os fiscais conseguiram implementar a legislação trabalhista de forma a promover tanto a melhoria das condições de trabalho quanto a modernização (upgrading) das empresas. As conclusões do estudo sugerem que os fiscais do trabalho foram capazes de promover esses resultados – como, por exemplo, arranjos alternativos para empregar formalmente trabalhadores rurais por tempo determinado ou medidas técnicas para promover condições de trabalho mais saudáveis e seguras sem reduzir a produtividade da empresa – quando combinaram estratégias punitivas (como multas, sanções) com ações pedagógicas (como prestação de assessoria técnica e jurídica). Os quadros 1 e 2, no interior do texto, apresentam uma lista de casos e seus respectivos resultados. This paper addresses the following question: how can we reconcile workers' rights and social protection with firms' competitiveness and productivity? In Latin America, there is an intense debate about the perverseness of the labor law (claimed to be harmful both to workers and to firms) and, in response, current policy advice emphasizes deregulation and the flexibilization of existing labor rights. In contrast to the standard policy advice, this research demonstrates that there are more "degrees of freedom" to reconcile workers' rights with competitiveness when one focuses on the implementation of the labor law. I investigated the street-level work performed by labor inspectors in two Brazilian states (Minas Gerais and Bahia) and I found out that in some cases labor inspectors have been able to implement labor law in a way that promotes both the improvement of working conditions as well as firm upgrading. My findings suggest that labor inspectors have been able to promote these outcomes–such as alternative arrangements for formally hiring short-term rural workers or technical measures to promote safer working conditions without jeopardizing firm's productivity, for example–by combining both punitive (e.g., fines, sanctions) with pedagogical (e.g., technical and legal assistance) enforcement strategies. For a list of the cases as well as their respective outcomes, please refer to chart 1 and 2.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Pires, 2008. "Compatibilizando Direitos Sociais com Competividade: Fiscais do Trabalho e a Implementação da Legislação Trabalhista no Brasil," Discussion Papers 1354, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1354.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fairris, David & Jonasson, Erik, 2016. "Determinants of Changing Informal Employment in Brazil, 2000–2010," MPRA Paper 71475, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.