IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/995034190802676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regulatory options for conflicts of law and jurisdictional issues in the on-demand economy

Author

Listed:
  • Cherry, Miriam A.

Abstract

On demand platforms are changing and reshaping our conceptions of both the firm and the work relationship in far-reaching and critical ways, allowing companies to hire workers and to seek customers across national boundaries. While some commentators believe existing forms of labour and employment regulations can stretch to cover on-demand work, others have called for new legal initiatives specifically crafted for online platforms. Confronted with low pay and problematic working conditions, gig workers around the world have turned to the courts, attempting to invoke the protections of traditional labour and employment law. The goal of this paper is to provide a global framework for thinking about the on-demand business model and these assorted conflicts of law and jurisdictional issues. Throughout, the paper emphasizes the need for further coordinated multilateral study, discussion, and regulatory action to assist both crowdworkers and businesses as they navigate the on-demand model of production.

Suggested Citation

  • Cherry, Miriam A., 2019. "Regulatory options for conflicts of law and jurisdictional issues in the on-demand economy," ILO Working Papers 995034190802676, International Labour Organization.
  • Handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:995034190802676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ilo.userservices.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/41ILO_INST/1261199650002676
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janine Berg & Miriam A. Cherry & Uma Rani, 2019. "Digital labour platforms: a need for international regulation?," Revista de Economía Laboral - Spanish Journal of Labour Economics, Asociación Española de Economía Laboral - AEET, vol. 16, pages 104-128.
    2. Miriam A. CHERRY, 2020. "Back to the future: A continuity of dialogue on work and technology at the ILO," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 1-23, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    precarious employment; informal economy; conflict of laws; EDP personnel; conditions of employment; international labour standards; regulation.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:995034190802676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vesa Sivunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.