IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00476.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Indian Managers: Perception of Self and Others

Author

Listed:
  • Parikh Indira J

Abstract

The Research is based on the analysis of the stories written by thirty six senior managers and twenty one middle managers. The objectives of the research were to examine the managers’ perception of themselves, their role and that of the superiors, colleagues and subordinates, to examine the nature of role relationship and their perception of the situation and its resolution. Six slides of Tehmatic Appreception Test (TAT) were projected on the screen for half a minute and five minutes were given for writing the stories. Three slides numbers 2,3&6 depict one person situation while 1,3&5 depict two or more person situation. The one person situation is dominantly perceived by the managers as task situation and dominant resolution is that of failure. The nature of relationship is dominantly perceived as father-son or superior-subordinate. Dominant resolution is that of failure. The findings suggest that Indian managers find it difficult to shift their role attitudes from that of an employee to a representative status. Organizations continue to demand processes of conformity and working within the narrow boundaries of the job. Enlargement of roles generate anxiety and stress. The research suggests that both organizations and managers need to explore the elements and processes of large and complex organizations which demand changes congruent to the emergent tasks and inter-dependence of functional roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Parikh Indira J, 1981. "Indian Managers: Perception of Self and Others," IIMA Working Papers WP1981-12-01_00476, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.