IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/wp00215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Self Medication Practices: An Exploratory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Sen Gupta Subroto

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify the diseases which are commonly self-treated, people’s sources of information about drugs, the differential credibility attributed to these information sources the degree of perceived risk in self-medication and pre dispositional differences among people in the adoption of various risk reduction methods. Ninety adults from three separate localities of Ahmedabad were interviewed with the help of a structured interview schedule. In addition, 13 general medical practitioners in Bombay were interviewed for assessing their reactions to self-medication in the context of usage of over-the-counter drugs. The results showed that headache is self-treated by almost all. However, some diseases fall in the “gray” area wherein about half the people treat themselves and the other half consult the doctor. With respect to source credibility, elders in the family rank next to the doctor who commands the highest credibility. Regarding purchases of OTC drugs, risk reduction is achieved primarily by buying the medicine that was recommended earlier by the doctor and/or satisfaction derived from previous usage. It was also found that those who express a lot of concern over health and minor ailments adopt a variety of risk reduction methods and are considerably responsive to advertisements. Greater awareness of brands also appears to have a direct relationship with the frequency of purchase of drugs. Implications of findings for possible marketing action have been discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen Gupta Subroto, 1976. "Self Medication Practices: An Exploratory Study," IIMA Working Papers WP1976-11-01_00215, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:wp00215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.