IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb17-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Against the Wind: China's Struggle to Integrate Wind Energy into Its National Grid

Author

Listed:
  • Long Lam

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

  • Lee Branstetter

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Ines M. L. Azevedo

    (Carnegie Mellon University)

Abstract

China launched an unprecedented wind farm construction boom a decade ago to expand renewable energy’s share of its primary energy by exploiting its considerable wind energy resources. On the surface these efforts appeared to yield great success, with China’s wind generating capacity growing more than 100-fold in less than 10 years. But close examination of its aggressive top-down approach to the promotion of renewable energy reveals that China has fallen far short of its ambitious goals. Turbines were quickly installed—but many of them were not connected to the power grid. After some turbines were connected, the state-owned enterprises that operate the national grid often refused to accept energy from them. These problems led to inefficiencies that are without precedent in the Western world. The authors find that although its installed wind energy capacity is 75 percent larger than that of the United States, China produces 14 percent less wind energy than the United States. Even in a political system with a strong centralized government, China’s push for renewable power faltered in the face of entrenched interests, weak incentives, and conflicting policy priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Long Lam & Lee Branstetter & Ines M. L. Azevedo, 2017. "Against the Wind: China's Struggle to Integrate Wind Energy into Its National Grid," Policy Briefs PB17-5, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb17-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/against-wind-chinas-struggle-integrate-wind-energy-its-national-grid
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengjia Ren, Lee G. Branstetter, Brian K. Kovak, Daniel Erian Armanios, and Jiahai Yuan, 2021. "Why Has China Overinvested in Coal Power?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 113-134.
    2. Gandenberger, Carsten, 2017. "Giant and dwarf - China's two faces in wind energy innovation," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S07/2017, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Nicolae Marinescu, 2017. "Wind Energy In The Eu: How Does Romania Fare?," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 83-87, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb17-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.