IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb06-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Doha Round after Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Jeffrey J. Schott

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Trade ministers from member countries of the World Trade Organization (WTO) convened in Hong Kong in December 2005 to jump-start the flagging Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations. The ministerial accomplished more in spirit than in substance and placed more emphasis on negotiating process than on policy reform. The industrial countries offered up kernels of subsidy reform and development assistance, but all the big-ticket items were studiously deferred to future meetings. Progress on nonagricultural market access and services was microscopic. Without substantive offers in these areas, the United States and European Union will not be able to augment their offers on farm reforms. Developing countries are skeptical that the European Union will up the ante in agriculture even if they offer concrete reforms on goods and services trade. In any event, most developing countries are reluctant to lower their own market access barriers. So neither side moves. Trade ministers do not have the political authority to break this "Alphonse and Gaston" routine and approve reforms in sensitive areas that are needed to produce a comprehensive package of accords acceptable to all WTO members. To succeed, the Doha Round needs a political jolt. A trade summit involving heads of state of countries whose policy reforms are crucial to the success of the WTO talks must be convened to break the impasse.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Jeffrey J. Schott, 2006. "The Doha Round after Hong Kong," Policy Briefs PB06-2, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb06-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/doha-round-after-hong-kong
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Das, Dilip K., 2008. "Suspension of the Doha Round of Multilateral Negotiations and the Need for Its Resuscitation," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13.
    2. Antoni Estevadeordal & Kati Suominen & Jeremy Harris & Matthew Shearer, 2009. "Bridging Regional Trade Agreements in the Americas: Special Report on Integration and Trade," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 20098, February.
    3. Dilip Das, 2008. "A Kiss of Life for the Withering Doha Round of the Multilateral Trade Negotiations?," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 293-310.
    4. Estevadeordal, Antoni & Suominen, Kati & Harris, Jeremy & Shearer, Matthew, 2009. "Bridging Regional Trade Agreements in the Americas: Special Report on Integration and Trade," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 255.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb06-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.