IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/apr-fall-2018-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Costs and Benefits of Nutrient Reduction Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Chuan Tang
  • Yau-Huo Shr
  • Gabriel E. Lade
  • David A. Keiser
  • Catherine L. Kling

Abstract

In the fall of 1997, the Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force was established to better understand and address hypoxia concerns in the Gulf of Mexico. In 2008, the Task Force released an action plan outlining a national strategy to tackle recurrent hypoxic conditions in the Northern Gulf of Mexico and improve water quality in the Mississippi River Basin. The report suggests that at least a 45 percent reduction in riverine total nitrogen and phosphorus is needed in order to control the size of the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Complementary efforts by EPA have encouraged individual states to establish frameworks to reduce nutrient pollution in their states. The EPA underscores that nitrogen and phosphorus pollution could become "one of the costliest and the most challenging environmental problems [in the United States]."

Suggested Citation

  • Chuan Tang & Yau-Huo Shr & Gabriel E. Lade & David A. Keiser & Catherine L. Kling, 2018. "The Costs and Benefits of Nutrient Reduction Programs," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications apr-fall-2018-4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:apr-fall-2018-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/ag_policy_review/article/?a=88
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/ag_policy_review/pdf/fall-2018.pdf
    File Function: Full Issue Text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:apr-fall-2018-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.