IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hub/wpecon/200729.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Voluntary disclosure of corporate social responsibility by Belgian listed firms: a content analysis of annual reports

Author

Listed:
  • Everaert, Patricia

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium)

  • Bouten, Lies

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium)

  • Van Liedekerke, Luc

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • De Moor, Lieven

    (Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB), Belgium
    Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

  • Christiaens, Johan

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

This paper examines the reporting practices of Belgian listed firms, in terms of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Four research questions are addressed: (1) What CSR areas are disclosed in the annual report? (2) What is the extent of the CSR reporting for the different areas? (3) How is the CSR reporting performed (qualitative versus quantitative)? (4) Is there a link between the extent of reporting and industry, profitability or size of the company? Based on the Global Reporting Initiative’s Reporting Guidelines, we developed a coding structure. The annual reports of 111 firms listed on Euronext Brussels, were coded and analyzed. The results show that only 58% disclose on CSR topics. In terms of topics, almost 90% disclose on labour practices, 67% on environment issues, 55% on product responsibility and 56% on society. Only 5% disclose on human rights. In terms of the extent of reporting, measured as the number of words, labour practices is addressed most extensively (representing 40% of the CSR disclosure), followed by environmental issues (representing 31% of the CSR disclosure). Society and product responsibility are disclosed in a far less elaborate way (only 16, respectively 12% of the total CSR disclosure). Companies disclose almost exclusively in a verbal way. The extent of reporting is significantly different between industries. Utilities and banks are providing significantly more elaborate CSR reporting than the other categories. The extent of disclosure is significantly positively correlated with size and profitability of the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Everaert, Patricia & Bouten, Lies & Van Liedekerke, Luc & De Moor, Lieven & Christiaens, Johan, 2007. "Voluntary disclosure of corporate social responsibility by Belgian listed firms: a content analysis of annual reports," Working Papers 2007/29, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lirias.hubrussel.be/handle/123456789/2206
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannes M. Luetz & Elizabeth Nichols & Karen du Plessis & Patrick D. Nunn, 2023. "Spirituality and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Word Frequency Analysis and an Agenda for Research in Pacific Island Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Cristina Gianfelici & Andrea Casadei & Federica Cembali, 2018. "The Relevance of Nationality and Industry for Stakeholder Salience: An Investigation Through Integrated Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 541-558, June.
    3. Hina Ismail & Muhammad A. Saleem & Sadaf Zahra & Muhammad S. Tufail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hub:wpecon:200729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Janssens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emhubbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.