IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hrv/faseco/5343023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patient, Physician, and Payment Predictors of Statin Adherence

Author

Listed:
  • Chan, David Chimin
  • Avorn, Jerry Lewis
  • Solomon, Daniel Hal
  • Brookhart, Alan
  • Choudhry, Niteesh K
  • Cutler, David M.
  • Jan, Saira
  • Fischer, Michael Adam
  • Liu, Jun
  • Shrank, William H.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many patient, physician, and payment predictors of adherence have been described, knowledge of their relative strength and overall ability to explain adherence is limited. OBJECTIVES: To measure the contributions of patient, physician, and payment predictors in explaining adherence to statins RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using administrative data SUBJECTS: 14,257 patients insured by Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (BCBSNJ) who were newly prescribed a statin cholesterol-lowering medication MEASURES: Adherence to statin medication was measured during the year after the initial prescription, based on proportion of days covered (PDC). The impact of patient, physician, and payment predictors of adherence were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. The explanatory power of these models was evaluated with C statistics, a measure of the goodness of fit. RESULTS: Overall, 36.4% of patients were fully adherent. Older patient age, male gender, lower neighborhood percent black composition, higher median income, and fewer number of emergency department (ED) visits were significant patient predictors of adherence. Having a statin prescribed by a cardiologist, a patient's primary care physician, or a US medical graduate were significant physician predictors of adherence. Lower copayments also predicted adherence. All of our models had low explanatory power. Multivariate models including patient covariates only had greater explanatory power (C = 0.613) than models with physician variables only (C = 0.566) or copayments only (C = 0.543). A fully specified model had only slightly more explanatory power (C = 0.633) than the model with patient characteristics alone. CONCLUSIONS: Despite relatively comprehensive claims data on patients, physicians, and out-of-pocket costs, our overall ability to explain adherence remains poor. Administrative data likely do not capture many complex mechanisms underlying adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, David Chimin & Avorn, Jerry Lewis & Solomon, Daniel Hal & Brookhart, Alan & Choudhry, Niteesh K & Cutler, David M. & Jan, Saira & Fischer, Michael Adam & Liu, Jun & Shrank, William H., 2010. "Patient, Physician, and Payment Predictors of Statin Adherence," Scholarly Articles 5343023, Harvard University Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hrv:faseco:5343023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/5343023/PATIENT,%20PHYSICIAN,%20AND%20PAYMENT.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabelle Rao & Adir Shaham & Amir Yavneh & Dor Kahana & Itai Ashlagi & Margaret L. Brandeau & Dan Yamin, 2020. "Predicting and improving patient-level antibiotic adherence," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 507-519, December.
    2. Vicente F. Gil-Guillen & Alejandro Balsa & Beatriz Bernárdez & Carmen Valdés y Llorca & Emilio Márquez-Contreras & Juan de la Haba-Rodríguez & Jose M. Castellano & Jesús Gómez-Martínez, 2022. "Medication Non-Adherence in Rheumatology, Oncology and Cardiology: A Review of the Literature of Risk Factors and Potential Interventions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Andrew J Zimolzak & Claire M Spettell & Joaquim Fernandes & Vincent A Fusaro & Nathan P Palmer & Suchi Saria & Isaac S Kohane & Magdalena A Jonikas & Kenneth D Mandl, 2013. "Early Detection of Poor Adherers to Statins: Applying Individualized Surveillance to Pay for Performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hrv:faseco:5343023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Office for Scholarly Communication (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deharus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.