IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/35psy2015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Role of Labels in Learning Statistically Dense and Statistically Sparse Categories

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey A. Kotov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Liana B. Agrba
  • Elizaveta V. Vlasova

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Tatyana N. Kotova

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

Subjects were given classic category formation tasks with feedback. We used two types of categories—statistically dense and statistically sparse. We conducted four experiments to assess the influence of sign type (experiment 1) and the interference of redundant actions performed with the sign (experiment 2) on the performance of learning different types of categories. We found that in the case of dense category formation, the visual distinction of the sign from other object features is more important. In the case of sparse category formation, easy verbalization is more important. Additionally we showed that verbal interference, directed at the actions with the sign, improves sparse category formation, but worsens dense category formation. The results of our experiments are discussed in accordance with the Competition Between Verbal and Implicit Systems (COVIS) model of multiple systems of categorization.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey A. Kotov & Liana B. Agrba & Elizaveta V. Vlasova & Tatyana N. Kotova, 2015. "The Role of Labels in Learning Statistically Dense and Statistically Sparse Categories," HSE Working papers WP BRP 35/PSY/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:35psy2015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2015/03/19/1092634065/35PSY2015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    categorization; concept formation; sign; category structure; learning.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:35psy2015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.