IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/188-hum-2020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

USING DISSERTATION REVIEWS FOR STUDYING ACADEMIC CONVENTIONS (RUSSIA, LATE 19th – EARLY 20th CENTURIES)

Author

Listed:
  • Ksenia M. Belik

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

At the turn of the XIX – XX centuries scientists focused on the procedure of the dissertation research’s scientifically verifications, create expert forms for assessing the quality of scientific work. One of these procedural forms became peer review. The article examines the culture of dissertation reviews at Russian universities in the designated period. The author, using an examples from specific texts of reviews, focuses on the formation of conventions, on criteria for assessing the quality of research, identifies the basic requirements for the degree of scientific texts. The main conclusion of the article is that the assessment texts contributed to the conclusion of academic agreements and their maintenance (retention).

Suggested Citation

  • Ksenia M. Belik, 2020. "USING DISSERTATION REVIEWS FOR STUDYING ACADEMIC CONVENTIONS (RUSSIA, LATE 19th – EARLY 20th CENTURIES)," HSE Working papers WP BRP 188/HUM/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:188/hum/2020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2020/03/16/1565302758/188HUM2020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Russian Empire; reviews; educational traditions; academic degrees; academic culture; university research.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z - Other Special Topics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:188/hum/2020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.