IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hig/wpaper/08hum2012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

17th Century Political Cartesianism and Its Opponents, or Imaging the State from Point Fixe

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Ivanova

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.)

  • Pavel Sokolov

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.)

Abstract

This article examines the relation of two models of civil science in the early modern political literature: the rhetorical science of contingency (rhetorica primaria), and mathesis politica, associated with Descartes by some early Enlightenment authors. The authors analyze the reception of the rhetorical aspect of Hobbes’s civil science with a special focus on Vico’s criticism of Hobbes’s constructivist state model, showing how Vico counters the Hobbesian ‘protosociological’ style of theorizing with his own historical way of reflecting on the social and ‘open’ structure of political action.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Ivanova & Pavel Sokolov, 2012. "17th Century Political Cartesianism and Its Opponents, or Imaging the State from Point Fixe," HSE Working papers WP BRP 08/HUM/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:08hum2012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hse.ru/data/2012/11/19/1248698473/08HUM2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobbes, Thomas, 1651. "Leviathan, or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number hobbes1651a.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuomas Ylä-Anttila & Eeva Luhtakallio, 2016. "Justifications Analysis: Understanding Moral Evaluations in Public Debates," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Damian Bäumlisberger, 2019. "The United Nations Global Compact as a Facilitator of the Lockean Social Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 187-200, September.
    3. Pongou, Roland & Tchantcho, Bertrand, 2021. "Round-robin political tournaments: Abstention, truthful equilibria, and effective power," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 331-351.
    4. Bliss, Sam & Egler, Megan, 2020. "Ecological Economics Beyond Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Grajzl, Peter & Murrell, Peter, 2016. "A Darwinian theory of institutional evolution two centuries before Darwin?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PA), pages 346-372.
    6. Uwe Sunde, 2006. "Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und Demokratie – Ist Demokratie ein Wohlstandsmotor oder ein Wohlstandsprodukt?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 7(4), pages 471-499, November.
    7. Arye L. Hillman, 2021. "Constitutional political economy: Ulysses and the prophet Jonah," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 1-6, January.
    8. Virginia Cecchini Manara & Lorenzo Sacconi, 2019. "Institutions, Frames, and Social Contract Reasoning," Econometica Working Papers wp71, Econometica.
    9. Wolfgang Buchholz & Wolfgang Peters, 2005. "A Rawlsian Approach to International Cooperation," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 25-44, February.
    10. Kjell Hausken, 2018. "Janet Tai Landa: Economic success of Chinese merchants in Southeast Asia: identity, ethnic cooperation and conflict: integrating the social sciences with evolutionary biology," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 251-256, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:wpaper:08hum2012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamil Abdulaev or Shamil Abdulaev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.