Conservatives say they are for small government and individual liberty, but a content analysis of leading conservative magazines shows that most have preponderantly failed to take pro-liberty positions on sex, gambling, and drugs. Besides many anti-liberty commissions, the magazines may be criticized for anti-liberty omission—that is, failing to oppose anti-liberty policies. Magazines investigated include National Review, The Weekly Standard, The American Enterprise, and The American Spectator. We find that National Review has had the strongest record on liberty on the issues treated, while the others have preponderantly failed to be pro-liberty or have even been anti-liberty.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by The Ratio Institute in its series Ratio Working Papers with number
131.
Length: 13 pages Date of creation: 24 Feb 2009 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:hhs:ratioi:0131
Note: To appear in The Independent Review Contact details of provider: Postal: The Ratio Institute, P.O. Box 5095, SE-102 42 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: 08-587 054 00 Fax: 08-587 054 05 Email: Web page: http://www.ratio.se/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Niclas Berggren).