Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Use and non-use of research evaluation A literature review

Contents:

Author Info

  • van der Most, Frank

    ()
    (CIRCLE, Lund University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    This paper reviews the literature in research evaluation and in social program evaluation on the topic of use and effects of research evaluation. The past two or three decades have seen the emergence of several new forms of research evaluation next to the existing peer review practices on papers and project proposals. The UK Research Assessment Exercises are among the most studied and discussed ones. Many other types of evaluations have received some attention but when it comes to their use and effects, interest also quickly faded. It seems time to re-address the issue and see what can be learned from the existing literature for a study of use and effects. The paper also draws on literature from social program evaluation for additional insights since in this field the concern for use and effects is further developed. The most important insight gained is that use and effects of evaluations extend beyond those implied by policy-cycle perspectives and peer review. Furthermore, concepts and conceptual frames from the field of science and technology studies can be productive in the study of a wide range of use and effects, including the pressing issue of non-use.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/201016_vanderMost.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy in its series Papers in Innovation Studies with number 2010/16.

    as in new window
    Length: 37 pages
    Date of creation: 20 Jan 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2010_016

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: CIRCLE, Lund University, PO Box 117, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
    Phone: +46 (0) 46 222 74 68
    Web page: http://www.circle.lu.se/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Research evaluation; social program evaluation;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. 234 – The benefits of environmental research
      by David Pannell in Pannell Discussions on 2013-03-25 13:14:36

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2010_016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Markus Grillitsch).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.