IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ctswps/2018_014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The precautionary principle and regulatory impact assessment: on the need for initial screening of hazards in regulatory work with examples from transport

Author

Listed:
  • Nerhagen, Lena

    (CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI))

  • Forsstedt, Sara

    (The Swedish Transport Agency)

  • Edvardsson, Karin

    (The Swedish Transport Agency)

Abstract

To achieve effective regulation, the OECD and the European Commission recommend the use of regulatory impact assessment (RIA). The full RIA process has however not been implemented in Sweden. There is for example a lack of established practices at the national level for the analysis of risk in regulatory work. Instead, soft law in the form of management by objective systems is guiding transport and environmental policy. These systems were introduced in the end of the 1990s following the international discussion on the precautionary principle. According to findings in other countries, policy making based on the precautionary principle may result in unexpected and unwanted consequences and therefore, based on a literature review and an assessment of current practices in transport regulation in Sweden, we suggest the use of an initial screening of hazards in regulatory work. We also apply the proposed method to four transport related case studies to illustrate how an initial assessment can provide the basis for an informed discussion on what hazards to counteract with regulation and on what grounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Nerhagen, Lena & Forsstedt, Sara & Edvardsson, Karin, 2018. "The precautionary principle and regulatory impact assessment: on the need for initial screening of hazards in regulatory work with examples from transport," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:14, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:ctswps:2018_014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cts.kth.se/polopoly_fs/1.842695!/CTS2018-14.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    precautionary principle; risk assessment; hazards; regulatory impact assessment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R40 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:ctswps:2018_014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CTS (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.cts.kth.se/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.