IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhb/lufewp/2003_006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding ethical closure in organizational settings the case of media organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Kärreman, Dan

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University)

  • Alvesson, Mats

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University)

Abstract

The paper addresses the formation of moral consciousness in organizations. In particular, it focus to what extent and how organizational arrangements encourage and/or prohibit the development and exercise of moral judgement among newspaper professionals. The paper draws empirically from a case study of a Swedish evening newspaper, and from interviews with professionals from various kinds of media organizations (TV, radio, print media). Drawing on Jackall’s (1988) concept of the ‘moral consciousness of bureaucracy’, and from the intellectual tradition of critical theory, the paper attempts to identify and discuss the specific processes that shape moral consciousness – or perhaps the lack of it – in organizational contexts in general, and in newspaper organizations in particular. The paper takes a particular interest in the process that disables and blocks the development and exercise of moral judgement, here labeled processes of ethical closure. Four specific cases of ethical closure; ethical sealing, ethical bracketing, double dehumanization, and commodification are identified and elaborated.

Suggested Citation

  • Kärreman, Dan & Alvesson, Mats, 2003. "Understanding ethical closure in organizational settings the case of media organizations," Working Paper Series 2003/6, Lund University, Institute of Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhb:lufewp:2003_006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhb:lufewp:2003_006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elsbeth Andersson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ielunse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.