This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Peer reviews i forskningsevaluering Kvalitetsbedømmelse af forskning, når vilkårene for vidensproduktion forandres

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Hansson, Finn (Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School)
Abstract

Det videnskabelige peer review har været anset som en helt central institution i den moderne videnskabs udvikling til vurdering af videnskabelig kvalitet i de sidste 100 år - fra udvælgelse af artikler over vurdering af projekter til ansættelse af forskere. Peer review’ets betydning er hidtil ikke blevet påvirket af de seneste års samfundsmæssig forandringer i videnskabens og forskningens organisation og funktion. Den moderne videnskabens fremvækst og institutionaliseri-ng skete i en historisk periode, hvor det fra videnskabens side handlede om at frigøre sig fra tidligere tiders politiske og religiøse forsøg på indgriben og kontrol gennem at udvikle sine egne, interne regler og normer. Dette kan ikke siges at være tilfældet i dag, hvor videnskaben i stigende grad integreres i samfundet - ikke mindst på baggrund af videnskabens eller den videnskabelige videns omfattende betydning for samfundets økonomiske udvikling. Dette betyder også, at de systemer (normer, regler) der oprindeligt fremmede videnskabens autonomi i samfundet ikke længere kan antages at have den samme betydning og vægt i samfundet som tidligere.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://openarchive.cbs.dk/handle/10398/6376
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy in its series Working Papers with number 7/2000.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 33 pages
Date of creation: 01 Jun 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:hhb:cbslpf:2000_007

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School, Blaagaardsgade 23 B, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
Phone: +45 3815 3815
Email:
Web page: http://www.cbs.dk/departments/mpp/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Lars Nondal).

Related research
Keywords: Peer reviews; Research;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.