Technological competition, creative destruction and the competitive process

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Technological competition, creative destruction and the competitive process

Author Info

Howells, John () (Department of Organisation and Management, Aarhus School of Business)

Abstract

This paper takes a simple definition of competition as a threat to established revenues. It then develops this idea as it applies to technological change through a series of illustrative examples. "Technological competition" occurs only when one technology substitutes for another, for a given market. When innovation generates new uses - new markets - it does not result in technological competition.

Schumpeter's "creative destruction" is based on extreme examples of the substitution process, where substitution progresses until the established technology is largely destroyed for a given market. It is shown that established technologies are not necessarily completely destroyed and that they may survive in niche markets or a market distinct from that threatened.

Through a review of cases it is argued that the degree to which innovation is "radical" has an influence on the scale of threat imposed on established forms and so also influences their possible reactions to the threat.

The competition experienced between the innovating firms is considered as a distinct "competitive scenario" to that between innovators and establised firms. In some cases innovating firms may perceive a greater potential threat from technologically similar rivals than from established firms. It is argued that there is no reason to move from Schumpeter's position on the role of competition in providing the incentive to innovate; it remains a negative one, where innovation promises an escape from overcrowded markets.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management in its series Working Papers with number 2000-4.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 23 pages
Date of creation: 01 Jan 2000
Date of revision: 01 Nov 2003
Handle: RePEc:hhb:aardom:2000_004

Note: Replaced by "Competition derived from Innovation as a Susbstitution Threat" wp 2003-2
Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Aarhus School of Business, Fuglesangs Allé 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
Phone: +45 89 48 66 88
Fax: + 45 86 15 01 88
Web page: http://www.asb.dk/about/departments/man.aspx
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Helle Vinbaek Stenholt).

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

Howells, John, 2000. "The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition - Does the sailing ship effect exist?," Working Papers 2000-1, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management. [Downloadable!]

Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-1.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.