We show how Barro and Sahasakul (1986) and Stephenson’s (1998) different methods for calculating time series of average marginal personal federal labor income tax rates are based on very different models of tax evasion and avoidance. One model assumes that taxable and untaxable income are (imperfectly) substitutable at the margin for all taxpayers, while the other assumes that substitution is not possible for any taxpayer, and that the average and marginal propensities to earn taxable income are the same. Using data provided in Stephenson we then update, for the years 1984-94, the Barro and Sahasakul comprehensive tax series based on the Barro and Sahasakul model of tax evasion and avoidance, and show how different it is from Stephenson’s series for the same years. For example, Stephenson finds that from 1988-1994 the comprehensive average marginal income tax rate fell from 22.2% to 21.5% while Barro and Sahasakul’s method implies that it rose from 30.3% to 32.1%.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago in its series Working Papers with number
0104.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)