IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-01240860.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Approche comparative des dispositifs anti-OPA sur un échantillon de 139 entreprises émanant de 15 Etat Membres

Author

Listed:
  • Viviane De Beaufort

    (ESSEC Business School)

Abstract

Comparison of rules and practices between European countries which measures the effect of the Directive of 2004. The text put some essential principles (neutrality of the management (article 9), limitation of anti-takeover devices (article 11) and requirement of transparency (article 10) but giving in to States, establish an opting-out (article 12) allowing the member states to choose more or less their system. It is possible to distinguish four groups of countries: the Balts (the most liberal), the countries Anglo-Saxon which dedicate the neutrality of the management but keep (preserve) certain preventive devices (plans), the Rhenish group where the logic of collective governance prevails thus tolerating prevention and reaction, and finally, the Latin of which France which did not opt clearly for a system "every shareholder" or a "collective logic", with as a bonus a complex regulations and unstable choices of companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Viviane De Beaufort, 2015. "Approche comparative des dispositifs anti-OPA sur un échantillon de 139 entreprises émanant de 15 Etat Membres," Working Papers hal-01240860, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01240860
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://essec.hal.science/hal-01240860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://essec.hal.science/hal-01240860/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-01240860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.