IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpaper/hal-00665414.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Évaluation de la qualité de la formation professionnelle dans les politiques publiques

Author

Listed:
  • Fabienne Berton

    (CRF - Centre de recherche sur la formation - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université - ENSTA Bretagne - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées Bretagne)

  • Jean-François Germe

    (CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to propose a synthesis about the French practices concerning the evaluation of quality aspects in vocational training, especially where public policies are concerned. We have selected a relatively small number of evaluation studies (40 reports), which are directly concerned with the CEDEFOP's priority : the training programmes for people that are unemployed or threatened by unemployment. They are principally recent reports, published in the nineties. These reports are mainly issued from public governments or from study and research centers. They concern training programmes which are fully or partially financed by public funds. These training programmes mainly concern two categories: young people and unemployed, but employees can also be involved in the case of retraining courses. These different evaluations do not use the same methods. On the one hand each evaluation appears to be specific while it is related to the specific goal of the particular program, on the other hand the evaluation methods evolve during the time because the relationship between training ant employment are better known. Hence we propose to group the evaluation methods in two large categories: the substantial evaluations and the procedural ones. This typology allows us to emphasize both the each method specificities and the general evolutions of the methods. The first category is thus named because it is related to the results of training actions in regard to their goals. In the second case, the evaluation is concerned with the internal running of the action and particularly in the whole procedures, modes, agreements, conflicts, negotiations, arrangements, translations... that practically appears at the different levels of the exercise.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabienne Berton & Jean-François Germe, 1997. "Évaluation de la qualité de la formation professionnelle dans les politiques publiques," Working Papers hal-00665414, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00665414
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00665414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00665414/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-00665414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.