IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03506762.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How mixing meta-organization and social enterprise literatures can enhance the understanding of social territorialized clusters like PTCEs in a multi-level perspective?

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Saniossian
  • Laurent Fraisse

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Francesca Petrella

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nadine Richez-Battesti

    (LEST - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Sociologie du Travail - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to develop a dialogic discussion about literatures of multi-stakeholder meta-organization (MSMO) (Ahrne & Brunsson, 2005, 2008; Berkowitz et al., 2020) and social enterprises (Borzaga & Defourny, 2001 ; Defourny, Nyssens, 2017). Building upon the analysis of French PTCEs, this paper is a contribution to a better understanding of how multi-stakeholder cooperation dynamics at the territorial scale emerge, develop and, to some extent, are institutionalized. Territorial poles of economic cooperation (PTCEs) are a French type of cluster within the social and solidarity economy that promotes the cooperation between a diversity of stakeholders at the territorial level. Based on comparative and secondary analyses of previous studies on PTCEs in France including our own work (Fraisse, 2017; Bourbousson, Richez-Battesti, 2017, Saniossian, 2020), we will analyze how specificities of PTCEs can contribute to a research agenda for multi-stakeholder meta-organizations (MSMO) and of social enterprises at the territorial level. Our analysis highlights that, on the one hand, there is a sub-conceptualization of multi-stakeholder meta-organizations in the social enterprise literature, focused on the organizational level. On the other hand, the social purpose of MSMO is not enough taken into account in this literature, nor are the institutionalization processes and external pressures in the creation of MSMOs. Meta-organizations are of different types and serve different purposes. They organize collective action between members and share resources and skills between them aiming at developing industries or production. In some cases, they also share sustainable purpose and activities. Focusing on MSMO, we will see that social challenges mainly refer to worldwide goals with creation of globalized MSMOs (NGOs, international firms and international authorities) and that the territorial anchorage of the interorganisational cooperation is not often dealt in the literature. Social enterprise - and more broadly social and solidarity economy - conceptualisation invites to integrate into the analysis of interactions between members in MSMO the diversity of organisations in terms of pluralities of economic and/or social purposes, the modes of entrepreneurship, of decision-making processes and of company ownership regimes. As a result, multi-stakeholder governance issues and resources hybridization are decisive variables for understanding the territorialization of economic cooperation initiated by social enterprises. Based on these differences in conceptual frameworks, we would like to show how fertile a dialogue between meta-organisations and social enterprises literatures could be, in particular when cooperation dynamics and territorial development processes are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Saniossian & Laurent Fraisse & Francesca Petrella & Nadine Richez-Battesti, 2021. "How mixing meta-organization and social enterprise literatures can enhance the understanding of social territorialized clusters like PTCEs in a multi-level perspective?," Post-Print halshs-03506762, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03506762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03506762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.