IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03126465.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A tale of "two cultures"?: A critical assessment of gender-education-cultural divergence in energy perception

Author

Listed:
  • Roh-Pin Pin Lee

    (Institut für Geologie [Freiberg] - Institute for Geology [Freiberg] - TU Bergakademie Freiberg - Technishe Universität Bergakademie Freiberg)

  • François Allard-Huver

    (Crem - Centre de Recherche sur les Médiations - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

Risk perception is socially constructed. Socialization influences at individual, group and societal levels can thus play a significant role in shaping how a person views his/her surrounding /environment, and lead to the development of different "cultures" in risk perception. While the term "two cultures" was originally used by Snow in 1956 to describe the gap between the natural/physical sciences and the humanities, a cultural divide has also been observed in risk analysis and assessment approaches by experts from different professional backgrounds (e.g. technical vs. social sciences). There is some evidence that the two cultures phenomenon has considerable relevance in the energy context. An education-induced cultural difference in energy perception has been demonstrated for nuclear energy between experts from different disciplines. Previous research furthermore suggests that a cultural divide in energy perception extends beyond education boundaries – a gender difference has been consistently observed in nuclear perception. Studies have also reported international differences in the perception and acceptance of nuclear energy It appears that gender (individual-level), education discipline (group-level) and culture-specific (societal-level) socialization play a significant role in shaping nuclear perception and contributing to divergence in how this energy source is being evaluated – and, in definitive, accepted. However, progress has been slow in explaining how such socialization influences could interact and plant the seeds for an eventual cultural divide in nuclear perception. Nor could previous studies provide insight into whether this three level / layer divergence (gender-education-cultural) is unique to nuclear perception or applies more generally across a range of energy sources. In the present research, our objective is an assessment of the two cultures phenomenon in energy perception. We examined the interaction of gender, education discipline and culture in influencing the perception of nuclear, coal and wind energy sources. 729 young adults (university students from engineering and business disciplines) from France, Germany and Russia took part in the survey study between February 2012 and January 2013. Findings indicated that gender, education discipline and culture-specific socialization contribute to the development of a "two cultures" in nuclear perception which is already detectable in young adults at the beginning of their higher education path. In contrast, this new cross-national and cultural approach, showed that societal norms appear to play a considerable role in shaping how young adults (irrespective of gender and education discipline) view coal and wind. Implications of findings for energy policy and industry decision-makers, educators as well as future research will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Roh-Pin Pin Lee & François Allard-Huver, 2014. "A tale of "two cultures"?: A critical assessment of gender-education-cultural divergence in energy perception," Post-Print halshs-03126465, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03126465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03126465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.