IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02878503.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

In debate : the method of general dynamic equilibrium
[La méthode de l’équilibre général dynamique en débat]

Author

Listed:
  • Redouane Taouil

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

Abstract

The 2008 crisis shook up the consensus that formed around the new synthesis which asserted itself, during the past decade, as a tradition of research centered around the analysis of nominal rigidities, money market imperfections and monetary policy within a dynamic and stochastic general equilibrium approach. It so gave rise to questionings emphasizing that the macroeconomics is in crisis due to empirical weaknesses, with regards to the hypotheses of rational expectations and financial markets efficiency. This thesis embeds two limitations: besides the fact that empirical control is not recognized as a decisive criterion in the evaluation of the relevance of macroeconomic theories, it is also counterproductive as it leads to widening the scope of the new synthesis through the integration of financial frictions. In such a context, the post-walrasian project, which main characteristic is the emphasis on observational data, does not by nature contribute to a change of paradigm.

Suggested Citation

  • Redouane Taouil, 2019. "In debate : the method of general dynamic equilibrium [La méthode de l’équilibre général dynamique en débat]," Post-Print halshs-02878503, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02878503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02878503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.