IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02424171.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

LOCAL AUTONOMY VERSUS SOCIAL CONTROL The ambivalence of the territorialization of public action
[AUTONOMIES LOCALES VERSUS CONTRÔLE SOCIAL Les ambivalences de la territorialisation de l'action publique]

Author

Listed:
  • Michel Casteigts

    (CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

Foucault gave the concept of "governmentality", introduced in 1978, a very broad definition, that of "conduct of conducts" and of the structural intervention of institutions in the field of action of people and individuals. Its construction creates a new grid for analyzing the place of power relations in social life, whose death of the philosopher did not allow the full deployment . This concept is fundamentally ambiguous: power and coercive mechanisms are no longer systematically contrary to freedoms, but they can, paradoxically, strengthen the capacity of individuals to act, while contributing to their subjugation. The territorialization of public policies is one of the most radical and universal reforms that the aparatuses of governmentality have undergone in decades. From the perspective of the evolution of power relations and their impact on the freedoms and capacities of individuals and social groups, the shift from central regulation to localized regulation has contradictory effects. On the one hand, it allows for the diversification of actors in collective life and the empowerment of their strategies. On the other hand, it strengthens the effectiveness of social control of behavior, whether "deviant" or not, by improving the link between institutional mesh and social gridlines. After briefly recalling the innovations introduced by the reference to governmentality in the conception of power relations and of their societal effects, this paper focuses on describing the main dynamics associated with the process of territorialization of public policies. Drawing on numerous examples from policies of urban planning, economic development, education, security, etc., it then highlights the relevance of the concept of governmentality in building a critical approach to the territorialization of policies and the decentralization of institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel Casteigts, 2015. "LOCAL AUTONOMY VERSUS SOCIAL CONTROL The ambivalence of the territorialization of public action [AUTONOMIES LOCALES VERSUS CONTRÔLE SOCIAL Les ambivalences de la territorialisation de l'action publ," Post-Print halshs-02424171, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02424171
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02424171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02424171/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02424171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.