IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02128183.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technical standards liberalization in FTAs of the United States, the European Union and China

Author

Listed:
  • Salam Alshareef

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

Abstract

States retain a high degree of autonomy to design technical standards according to their national objectives under the multilateral trade system. However, this autonomy is getting highly restrained in certain bilateral trade agreements. In this context, the article assesses the extent to which the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) eliminate or preserve national standardization space available under the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). It studies twenty-seven FTAs of three major economies with developing countries : nine FTAs of the United States, twelve FTAs of the European Union, and six Chinese FTAs. The article develops a new analytical framework that permits to analyse comparatively FTAs commitments on standard of the three economies, among each other and against the provisions of the WTO Agreement on TBT. While the FTAs of the United States and the European Union adopt uniform approaches and go systematically beyond the WTO Agreement on TBT in respect to standard liberalization, Chinese FTAs show varied patterns ranging from only affirming engagements under the WTO Agreement on TBT to including some commitments which go beyond it. While the national standardization space of the partner countries of the US and the EU shrinks to a historically low level, losing their autonomy in the design of technical standards, the Chinese approach tends to preserve the space available under the multilateral trade system.

Suggested Citation

  • Salam Alshareef, 2019. "Technical standards liberalization in FTAs of the United States, the European Union and China," Post-Print halshs-02128183, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02128183
    DOI: 10.54648/trad2019020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02128183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.