IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02097563.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutionnalisme économique versus management scientifique autour des 'labor problems' : quels fondements à la démocratie dans l’entreprise ?

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Dubrion

    (TRIANGLE - Triangle : action, discours, pensée politique et économique - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

"The turn of the 20th century has been characterized by vigorous debates between institutional labor economists and the proponents of scientific management concerning what was called labor problems. The main purpose of this paper is to examine the meaning of these debates and question the basis for the disagreement between the main authors of these two schools of thought, by focusing on the topic of democracy in companies, a central topic at that period. We show that two opposing views of work democracy can be identified. These views originate from different epistemological positions concerning the nature of work.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Dubrion, 2018. "Institutionnalisme économique versus management scientifique autour des 'labor problems' : quels fondements à la démocratie dans l’entreprise ?," Post-Print halshs-02097563, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02097563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02097563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.