IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01098925.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative study of organizational innovation and its link with technological innovation in Lower Normandy SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Khadidja Benallou

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mohammad Movahedi

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Jean Bonnet

    (TEPP - Travail, Emploi et Politiques Publiques - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Numerous research works have underlined the existence of diverse kinds of organizational innovations (OI). When small and medium enterprises from the industry sector (SMI's) are taken into account, it is nonetheless difficult to summarize this innovation in one even two organizational changes for a population considered as more heterogeneous than big firms. The complexity of the SMI's thus incites us to retain a great number of indicators of organizational changes in order to account for the diversity of cases. So we assume that the organizational innovation is made up of a range of changes and new practices. Sixteen variables have been retained, gathered into five categories corresponding to the different aspects of organizational changes: training and qualification, knowledge management, production management, quality management, and market transactions. Our first contribution is then to build synthetic and relevant indicators of organizational innovation in the context of SMI's with the aid of multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). Our second contribution is to measure the link between OI indicators with the different types of technological innovation. We then use two regression models of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to estimate the link between organizational innovation indicators and technological innovations (product, process and its interaction). The original database exploited is part of the IDEIS2 project and relates to a representative sample of 90 SMEs in Lower Normandy - France. The survey of the project has been realized during the 2009-2010 period and relates to data from the 2006-2008 period. Our synthetic indicators interpret two main dimensions: the Intensity of the implementation of the Organizational Changes (IOC) and the orientation of the Organizational Innovation Strategies (OIS) adopted (more or less based upon the quality of human resources). We find a positive and significant link between IOC and technological innovation and this especially in the case of product innovation. Size influences the IOC positively and significantly. By contrast there is no link between the choice of OIS (more or less based upon quality of human resources) and technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Khadidja Benallou & Mohammad Movahedi & Jean Bonnet, 2014. "Comparative study of organizational innovation and its link with technological innovation in Lower Normandy SMEs," Post-Print halshs-01098925, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01098925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01098925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.