IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00876671.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A three-model comparison of the relationship between quality, satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study of the Chinese healthcare system

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Ping

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • A. Jolibert

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Background: Previous research has addressed the relationship between customer satisfaction, perceived quality and customer loyalty intentions in consumer markets. In this study, we test and compare three theoretical models of the quality-satisfaction-loyalty relationship in the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: This research focuses on hospital patients as participants in the process of healthcare procurement. Empirical data were obtained from six Chinese public hospitals in Shanghai. A total of 630 questionnaires were collected in two studies. Study 1 tested the research instruments, and Study 2 tested the three models. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the scales' construct validity by testing convergent and discriminant validity. A structural equation model (SEM) specified the distinctions between each construct. A comparison of the three theoretical models was conducted via AMOS analysis. Results: The results of the SEM demonstrate that quality and satisfaction are distinct concepts and that the first model (satisfaction mediates quality and loyalty) is the most appropriate one in the context of the Chinese healthcare environment. Conclusions: In this study, we test and compare three theoretical models of the quality-satisfaction-loyalty relationship in the Chinese healthcare system. Findings show that perceived quality improvement does not lead directly to customer loyalty. The strategy of using quality improvement to maintain patient loyalty depends on the level of patient satisfaction. This implies that the measurement of patient experiences should include topics of importance for patients' satisfaction with health care services.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Ping & A. Jolibert, 2012. "A three-model comparison of the relationship between quality, satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study of the Chinese healthcare system," Post-Print halshs-00876671, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00876671
    DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bereket Yakob & Busisiwe Purity Ncama, 2016. "Correlates of perceived access and implications for health system strengthening – lessons from HIV/AIDS treatment and care services in Ethiopia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Yu-Te Tu & Heng-Chi Chih, 2013. "An Empirical Study of Corporate Brand Image, Customer Perceived Value and Satisfaction on Loyalty in Shoe Industry," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(7), pages 469-483.
    3. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Ke Jiang & Daming You & Zhendong Li & Wei Wei & Mitchell Mainstone, 2018. "Effects of Rural Medical Insurance on Chronically Ill Patients’ Choice of the Same Hospital Again in Rural Northern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-10, April.
    5. Ajimon George & Jobin Sahadevan, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework of Antecedents of Service Loyalty in Health Care: Patients’ Perspective," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 50-59, January.
    6. Muhammad Kashif & Umair Altaf & Hafiz M. Ayub & Umer Asif & John C. Walsh, 2014. "Customer Satisfaction at Public Hospitals in Pakistan: PAKSERV Application," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(4), pages 677-693, December.
    7. Kuei-Fang Ho & Cheng-Hsun Ho & Min-Huey Chung, 2019. "Theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance of the nursing process information system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Ahmad Saifalddin Abu-Alhaija & Hosni Shareif Hussein & Almothanna Jamil Abu Allan, 2019. "Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty: A Review and Future Directions of its Nature and Approaches," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 7(4), pages 28-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00876671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.