IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00754617.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Abductive logics in a belief revision framework

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Walliser

    (CERAS - Centre d'enseignement et de recherche en analyse socio-économique - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Denis Zwirn

    (CREA - Centre de recherche en épistémologie appliquée - X - École polytechnique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Hervé Zwirn

    (CMLA - Centre de Mathématiques et de Leurs Applications - ENS Cachan - École normale supérieure - Cachan - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IHPST - Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - DEC - Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Abduction was first introduced in the epistemological context of scientific discovery. It was more recently analyzed in artificial intelligence, especially with respect to diagnosis analysis or ordinary reasoning. These two fields share a common view of abduction as a general process of hypotheses formation. More precisely, abduction is conceived as a kind of reverse explanation where a hypothesis H can be abduced from events E if H is a "good explanation" of E. The paper surveys four known schemes for abduction that can be used in both fields. Its first contribution is a taxonomy of these schemes according to a common semantic framework based on belief revision. Its second contribution is to produce, for each non-trivial scheme, a representation theorem linking its semantic framework to a set of postulates. Its third contribution is to present semantic and axiomatic arguments in favor of one of these schemes, "ordered abduction," which has never been vindicated in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Walliser & Denis Zwirn & Hervé Zwirn, 2005. "Abductive logics in a belief revision framework," Post-Print halshs-00754617, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00754617
    DOI: 10.1007/s10849-005-2319-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00754617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.