IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00661273.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La malédiction du vainqueur : Peut-on en tenir compte dans l'analyse des effets unilatéraux ?

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Avenel

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gildas de Muizon
  • Nathalie Daley

Abstract

Les autorités de concurrence sont généralement préoccupées par la diminution du nombre d'enchérisseurs qu'engendre une opération de concentration sur un marché par appels d'offres. La théorie économique démontre pourtant qu'il existe des situations dans lesquelles la diminution du nombre de candidats conduit à une issue plus concurrentielle du processus d'appels d'offres. Cet article présente ces résultats théoriques et leur validation empirique, avant de s'interroger sur la possibilité d'en tenir compte lors de l'examen de fusions sur des marchés d'appels d'offres.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Avenel & Gildas de Muizon & Nathalie Daley, 2011. "La malédiction du vainqueur : Peut-on en tenir compte dans l'analyse des effets unilatéraux ?," Post-Print halshs-00661273, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00661273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fusions-acquisitions; appels d'offres;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00661273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.