IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00149709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Approche par les risques : les auditeurs peuvent-ils innover ?

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Thiéry-Dubuisson

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to examine the risk assessment approach used by audit firms in France. Over the last few years, most major audit firms have been reporting that their risk review now focuses on the business risks and the strategy of the client, rather than just internal control. This study describes the conditions under which such risk reviews are implemented, and their limitations.Interviews with partners on the major audit firms in France (both Fat Four and local firms) indicate that such approaches are contingent on the environment and on the structure of the audit client. The study also demonstrates that audit firms view this approach as a means of legitimatizing and reinforcing the role of the auditor. However, despite the willingness on the part of audit firms to implement this approach, they are hampered by inherent limitations. First, the hierarchical structure of audit firms is not innovation-friendly. Furthermore, current adverse business conditions lead to a difficult choice for the auditors between a conviction-based and a standards-based audit. Last, the natural aversion of auditors to constantly changing forecasts that come with business risks approaches limits their adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Thiéry-Dubuisson, 2003. "Approche par les risques : les auditeurs peuvent-ils innover ?," Post-Print halshs-00149709, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00149709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00149709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.