IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04523566.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska

    (UW - University of Warsaw)

  • Anna Domaradzka

    (UW - University of Warsaw)

  • Michael O’grady

    (UCD - University College Dublin [Dublin])

  • Baptiste Bedessem

    (INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, LISIS - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations, Sociétés - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Niccolò Tempini

    (University of Exeter)

  • Mateusz Trochymiak

    (UW - University of Warsaw)

  • Nina Wróblewska

    (UW - University of Warsaw)

Abstract

Until Recently, The citizen science approach to knowledge production had been confined to scientific research, applied to a limited range of questions on which scientists and citizens could collaborate and trust each other. More recently, this approach has gained increasing attention from various quarters outside the traditional remit of professionalized science, which include local governments, civil society organizations (CSOs), professional networks, and cooperatives. These entities recognize citizen science as a practical method that harnesses the collective resources of a community to address pressing local concerns and promote a robust participatory democracy. Emerging initiatives include citizen observatories, data cooperatives, and collaboration platforms. Despite the growing popularity, managing citizen science initiatives (involving numerous participants over an extended period of time) poses considerable challenges. Leaders of citizen science initiatives grapple with difficulties that appear formidable to overcome. At present, the democratic potential of citizen science necessitates further development and scrutiny from social and political actors. Critics frequently underscore a disparity between the democratic ideals associated with citizen science and its current practical implementation. This article outlines the primary benefits and challenges associated with the democratization of citizen science. It builds from the empirical research of the ISEED project 1 as well as the theoretical contribution of the Right to the Smart City project 2 and formulates 10 key recommendations to citizen science project leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska & Anna Domaradzka & Michael O’grady & Baptiste Bedessem & Niccolò Tempini & Mateusz Trochymiak & Nina Wróblewska, 2023. "Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science," Post-Print hal-04523566, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04523566
    DOI: 10.1109/MTS.2023.3344904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04523566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.