IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04509032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer’s Regulatory Orientation Scale: A Preliminary Test of Its Validity (An Abstract)

Author

Listed:
  • Patrice Cottet

    (REGARDS - Recherches en Économie Gestion AgroRessources Durabilité Santé- EA 6292 - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne - MSH-URCA - Maison des Sciences Humaines de Champagne-Ardenne - URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne)

  • Jean-Marc Ferrandi

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Marie-Christine Lichtlé

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Véronique Plichon

    (VALLOREM - Val de Loire Recherche en Management - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours)

Abstract

Through its ability to explain and predict a great many psychological processes and behavioral choices, regulatory focus is used more and more in marketing and appears to have a promising future (Haws et al. 2010). As first defined by Higgins (1997), regulatory focus can induce strategic inclinations to either approach or avoid an outcome. Although the conceptual foundations of regulatory focus are now quite broad, none of the regulatory focus measuring tools in use today gives entirely satisfactory results. The scales developed in the English-speaking world in particular are too contextual (application to work, artificial situations, etc.) and fail to factor in all the richness of the construct. Thus, this article has tried to propose a regulatory focus measure specific to consumption in real situations and in the French context. To this end, Churchill's (1979) recommendations were followed. The proposed scale was derived from the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire compiled by Higgins et al. (2001) with the inclusion of items that came out of semi-directed interviews of 30 French consumers. It was tested, after an online study, on 753 French consumers. The scale's structure and internal validity and convergence coefficients are correct. Besides the scale per se, the second aim of this article was to characterize consumers on the basis of their stable regulatory focus according to their dietary and buying habits and behavior in their private and work lives in general. A typology revealed four groups of consumers: "ecologically responsible promotion-oriented consumers" (20 %), "insecure prevention-oriented consumers" (25 %), "prevention-oriented consumers" (26 %), and "impulsive promotion-oriented consumers" (29 %). Two groups were promotion oriented and two were prevention oriented. In particular, the promotion-oriented individuals were characterized by less risk aversion and a stronger ability to dare to undertake things than the prevention-oriented individuals, with their willingness to take initiatives being linked to their self-confidence, confidence in their choices, and adaptability. They could be an interesting target when a new product is launched. For example, the "impulsive promotion-oriented" group consumers search for pleasure in doing their food shopping and may succumb to marketing temptations (Dholakia et al. 2006). Promotional actions and in-store events must thus target this type of consumers in particular. This research shows that regulatory focus is an antecedent of consumer behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrice Cottet & Jean-Marc Ferrandi & Marie-Christine Lichtlé & Véronique Plichon, 2016. "Consumer’s Regulatory Orientation Scale: A Preliminary Test of Its Validity (An Abstract)," Post-Print hal-04509032, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04509032
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04509032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.