IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04504567.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Conundrum of Accountability in Organisations: The Need for Dialogue

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Detchessahar

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

A number of recent organisational innovations suggest breaking with bureaucracy-inspired organ- isational models. They advocate new forms of management based on autonomy and the reinforce- ment of worker accountability. However, the concept of accountability is very difficult to use in organisational contexts. Organisations are spaces of collective action and multiple interdependen- cies between participants, which make attributing an action to an author very tricky. This explains why the pursuit of accountability often generates tensions, as individuals see it as an attempt to assign to them alone responsibilities that are more widely shared. Does this mean that we should stop using the vocabulary of accountability in organisations? This paper shows that it is only through regular dialogue about their professional activities that workers can take ownership of their work and accept accountability. Dialogue is therefore a precondition of accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Detchessahar, 2019. "The Conundrum of Accountability in Organisations: The Need for Dialogue," Post-Print hal-04504567, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04504567
    DOI: 10.4000/sdt.17693
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04504567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04504567/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4000/sdt.17693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04504567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.