IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04464237.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Costs associated with informal health care pathway for patients with suspected Lyme borreliosis
[Coûts associés au parcours de soins informels pour les patients avec suspicion de la borréliose de Lyme]

Author

Listed:
  • Lamriss Hamadou

    (CERDI - Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand)

  • Fantine Buteau

    (CERDI - Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand)

  • Delphine Martineau

    (CHU Clermont-Ferrand)

  • Léo Sauvat

    (CHU Clermont-Ferrand)

  • Martine Audibert

    (CERDI - Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International - UCA [2017-2020] - Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, FERDI - Fondation pour les Etudes et Recherches sur le Développement International)

  • Olivier Lesens

    (UMIT - Unité des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales - Centre Hospitalier Andrée Rosemon [Cayenne, Guyane Française], CHU Clermont-Ferrand)

Abstract

Objectives: to compare the direct and indirect medical costs of patients with suspected Lyme borreliosis according to whether or not they had used an informal care pathway. Patients and methods: We retraced the care pathways of participating patients by a prospective questionnaire survey and a retrospective analysis of care records. Direct and indirect costs were estimated using a micro-costing method from different perspectives. We compared the costs of patients who had consulted a "Lyme Doctor" (informal care pathway) with those who had only used the formal care pathway. Non-parametric tests were used to test the significance of the differences between the two groups of patients. Results: Of 103 eligible patients, 49 (including 12 who used an informal health care pathway) agreed to be investigated. Five expenditures items supported entirely by patients were significantly higher for patients following an informal care pathway: productivity loss (3 041 ± 6 580 versus 194 ± 1 177 euros, p=0.01), alternative therapies (3 484 ± 7 308 versus 369 ± 956 euros), biological tests sent abroad (571 ± 1 415 versus 17 ± 92 euros, p

Suggested Citation

  • Lamriss Hamadou & Fantine Buteau & Delphine Martineau & Léo Sauvat & Martine Audibert & Olivier Lesens, 2024. "Costs associated with informal health care pathway for patients with suspected Lyme borreliosis [Coûts associés au parcours de soins informels pour les patients avec suspicion de la borréliose de L," Post-Print hal-04464237, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04464237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.idnow.2023.104841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04464237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.